Analysis by RIGGSMED DNN | Second Opinion & Full CDI powered by Claude Sonnet 3.5 | v3.9.5
Quick: DNN only (~1s)Second Opinion: DNN vs Claude comparison (~6s)Full CDI: SOFA + Sepsis + Gaps (~30s)
MDM Analysis Results
Paste a note and click Paste & Analyze for quick results, or Full CDI Analysis for detailed review with SOFA scoring.
CDI Analysis & DiscussionPowered by Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Your DNN: SNF -
-Claude: SNF -
SOFA Score
-/24
KDIGO AKI Staging
-
Gap Analysis (Payer Denial Risk)
Model A/P for (High-Risk Organ Dysfunction)
CDI Analysis
Running analysis... SOFA score, gap analysis, and model A/P will appear here
Ask Follow-up Questions
Documentation Coach
After analysis, ask questions about: SOFA scoring, sepsis criteria, MDM levels, or how to fix specific documentation gaps
Explain SOFADenial risk?Document sepsisMDM level?
CLINICAL DOCUMENTATION QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL — NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR PROFESSIONAL CODING OR MEDICAL JUDGMENT
Privacy Notice: Notes submitted for Second Opinion or Full CDI Analysis are automatically de-identified before being sent to Claude Sonnet 3.5 for enhanced privacy protection.
This tool provides educational analysis to assist with documentation clarity and compliance. Final SNF code selection (99308-99310), diagnosis assignment, and all medical decisions remain solely the responsibility of the treating provider.
Providers must independently verify that all MDM elements, diagnoses, and clinical impressions accurately reflect their own work and comply with current SNF coding guidelines, Medicare SNF regulations, and institutional standards.
AI systems may generate errors, omissions, or hallucinations. Always use your own medical and billing judgment as the final deciding factor.